Reported Sites

“To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express strong concern regarding the decision by British ISPs to block access to the website animetosho.org. This action constitutes a form of unwarranted censorship that undermines principles of open internet access and free information exchange. Animetosho is a harmless site that serves as a community hub for anime fans, providing links and resources for legal and fan-subtitled content. There is no credible evidence to suggest that the site engages in or facilitates illegal activity that would justify its wholesale blocking. By restricting access to such platforms, ISPs are overreaching and impeding users’ legitimate interests. Blocking Animetosho sets a dangerous precedent where decisions are made without transparent review, disproportionately impacting niche communities and stifling cultural engagement. Such filtering mechanisms are blunt instruments that fail to respect the nuance and legality of the content involved. I urge British ISPs to reconsider their position and promptly remove animetosho.org from their filtering lists. Upholding open access to lawful websites is essential to maintaining a free, fair, and balanced digital environment. Sincerely, Mahir”

“This is the website for the online video game 'hackmud'. It is used to communicate with the game's servers. By blocking hackmud.com, the game is rendered inaccessible. This video game does not relate to real hacking, connection anonymisation, adult content or any other inappropriate activity that would constitute the need for a block in your default filters.”

“Hi, We’d like to clarify that our platform does not feature any public nudity. If there are concerns about compliance, we respectfully request a review in context with similar platforms. For instance, sites like tastyslips.com and snifffr.com appear to operate under comparable content guidelines. We’d appreciate it if you could confirm whether we are in violation of any specific policy, and if so, provide further details so we may address it appropriately. Looking forward to your response.”

“Hi, We’d like to clarify that our platform does not feature any public nudity. If there are concerns about compliance, we respectfully request a review in context with similar platforms. For instance, sites like tastyslips.com and snifffr.com appear to operate under comparable content guidelines. We’d appreciate it if you could confirm whether we are in violation of any specific policy, and if so, provide further details so we may address it appropriately. Looking forward to your response.”

“This is a false positive. studio.rodeo is a clean, secure, and professionally built design portfolio site showcasing my work and offering design services. It contains no malicious code, phishing content, or spam, and is hosted on a reputable platform (Framer). Please review and reclassify the site appropriately.”

“Whilst it is a pornography site that does not mean it should be censored”