Reported Sites

“There is nothing pornographic on my website. 444 82.132.234.176 - - [13/Mar/2018:21:32:26 +0000] "GET /fg.htm HTTP/1.1" 0 "-" "OrgProbe/2.0.0 (+http://www.blocked.org.uk)" "10.66.144.137" Go ahead and check www.lazygranch.com/fg.htm The problem is as recode old web pages, I have changed to .html rather than .htm. So I am redirecting to my own website. That is fg.htm redirects to fg.html. This is better than having dead links. ”

“site is classifed ads site, strictly no adult content allowed. It is heavily moderated, content is pre-screened and also regularly manually checked . site has been live since 2012”

“This is a site that is for people with a harmless interest. It does not contain offensive images or pornography, it is about sensible discussions from years gone by.”

“Not a x rated site in the free section ”

“It helps me”

“This is a business website for a firm of consulting engineers. There is no legitimate reason for blocking access to this site.”

“This is the St John's Ambulance service. How is blocking access to first aid advice, much of it aimed at children, protecting children? ”

“It relates to a bridal hair service...just a normal business, nothing inappropriate for a child. Why on earth is this being blocked?”

“This is the business website for a professional counselling service. There is no legitimate reason for blocking this site.”

“A business website.”

“This is the business website of a professional, registered and accredited counsellor. It does not fall into any category that should be blocked. ”

“This is the website and blog for a childrens' book illustrator. It is not a pornography site and should not be blocked.”

“This is a business website selling framed artwork prints. There is no reason to block this site. The word 'love' in the url is used in the sense 'like a lot' and has nothing to do with sex or pornography. The artworks do not feature sex or pornography. ”

“This URL redirects to the website of professional designer Mark Read. The site contains no content unsuitable for under-18s.”

“This is the website of a man who earns his living date timbers in old buildings. It does not fall into any category that should be blocked.”

“I own and pay for this site, it does not have anything related to pornography. It is a gathering for people to share information. There is nothing untoward on there.”

“I own and pay for this site, it does not contain images of an adult nature, it is a discussional gathering for people of similar interests. It does not contain pornographic images, there is no violence, no weapons and certainly no drugs.”

“This is a restaurant and bar in Newcastle.”

“This is the business website of a professional relationship and marriage guidance counsellor. It is not a pornography website nor does it fall into any other category that should be blocked. ”

“This is somebody's professional photography business. Pictures of weddings and babies playing with cake.”

“This site is about a US charity that supports children (and families) in Vietnam and Cambodia. I see no reason that it should be blocked”

“I am interested in natural healing”